How The ChatGPT Watermark Functions And Why It Might Be Defeated

Posted by

OpenAI’s ChatGPT presented a way to immediately produce content however plans to present a watermarking feature to make it easy to spot are making some people anxious. This is how ChatGPT watermarking works and why there might be a method to beat it.

ChatGPT is an extraordinary tool that online publishers, affiliates and SEOs at the same time love and fear.

Some marketers enjoy it due to the fact that they’re finding brand-new ways to utilize it to create content briefs, lays out and complicated posts.

Online publishers hesitate of the possibility of AI material flooding the search engine result, supplanting expert short articles composed by humans.

As a result, news of a watermarking function that unlocks detection of ChatGPT-authored material is also anticipated with anxiety and hope.

Cryptographic Watermark

A watermark is a semi-transparent mark (a logo design or text) that is embedded onto an image. The watermark signals who is the original author of the work.

It’s largely seen in photos and progressively in videos.

Watermarking text in ChatGPT involves cryptography in the form of embedding a pattern of words, letters and punctiation in the form of a secret code.

Scott Aaronson and ChatGPT Watermarking

An influential computer researcher called Scott Aaronson was employed by OpenAI in June 2022 to deal with AI Safety and Positioning.

AI Security is a research study field worried about studying ways that AI may pose a harm to humans and producing methods to avoid that type of negative disturbance.

The Distill scientific journal, including authors affiliated with OpenAI, defines AI Security like this:

“The objective of long-lasting expert system (AI) safety is to make sure that sophisticated AI systems are reliably lined up with human values– that they reliably do things that people want them to do.”

AI Positioning is the artificial intelligence field concerned with making sure that the AI is aligned with the designated goals.

A large language model (LLM) like ChatGPT can be used in a way that may go contrary to the goals of AI Positioning as defined by OpenAI, which is to create AI that advantages humanity.

Accordingly, the reason for watermarking is to avoid the abuse of AI in such a way that harms humankind.

Aaronson discussed the reason for watermarking ChatGPT output:

“This could be helpful for preventing scholastic plagiarism, clearly, but likewise, for example, mass generation of propaganda …”

How Does ChatGPT Watermarking Work?

ChatGPT watermarking is a system that embeds a statistical pattern, a code, into the options of words and even punctuation marks.

Material developed by expert system is created with a fairly foreseeable pattern of word choice.

The words written by humans and AI follow a statistical pattern.

Altering the pattern of the words utilized in created material is a way to “watermark” the text to make it simple for a system to discover if it was the product of an AI text generator.

The technique that makes AI material watermarking undetected is that the circulation of words still have a random look similar to typical AI generated text.

This is referred to as a pseudorandom distribution of words.

Pseudorandomness is a statistically random series of words or numbers that are not actually random.

ChatGPT watermarking is not currently in use. However Scott Aaronson at OpenAI is on record specifying that it is prepared.

Today ChatGPT remains in sneak peeks, which enables OpenAI to discover “misalignment” through real-world use.

Presumably watermarking might be presented in a last variation of ChatGPT or sooner than that.

Scott Aaronson blogged about how watermarking works:

“My main task up until now has actually been a tool for statistically watermarking the outputs of a text model like GPT.

Essentially, whenever GPT generates some long text, we want there to be an otherwise undetectable secret signal in its choices of words, which you can utilize to show later on that, yes, this originated from GPT.”

Aaronson discussed further how ChatGPT watermarking works. But first, it is very important to understand the principle of tokenization.

Tokenization is an action that takes place in natural language processing where the machine takes the words in a document and breaks them down into semantic systems like words and sentences.

Tokenization modifications text into a structured form that can be utilized in machine learning.

The process of text generation is the maker thinking which token comes next based upon the previous token.

This is done with a mathematical function that identifies the likelihood of what the next token will be, what’s called a probability circulation.

What word is next is predicted however it’s random.

The watermarking itself is what Aaron refers to as pseudorandom, in that there’s a mathematical factor for a particular word or punctuation mark to be there but it is still statistically random.

Here is the technical explanation of GPT watermarking:

“For GPT, every input and output is a string of tokens, which could be words however also punctuation marks, parts of words, or more– there are about 100,000 tokens in overall.

At its core, GPT is constantly creating a likelihood distribution over the next token to generate, conditional on the string of previous tokens.

After the neural net produces the circulation, the OpenAI server then in fact samples a token according to that circulation– or some modified version of the circulation, depending on a criterion called ‘temperature.’

As long as the temperature level is nonzero, however, there will typically be some randomness in the option of the next token: you could run over and over with the exact same prompt, and get a different completion (i.e., string of output tokens) each time.

So then to watermark, rather of choosing the next token randomly, the concept will be to choose it pseudorandomly, using a cryptographic pseudorandom function, whose secret is understood just to OpenAI.”

The watermark looks entirely natural to those checking out the text due to the fact that the choice of words is imitating the randomness of all the other words.

But that randomness consists of a bias that can only be detected by somebody with the secret to decipher it.

This is the technical description:

“To show, in the diplomatic immunity that GPT had a lot of possible tokens that it judged similarly possible, you could simply pick whichever token made the most of g. The choice would look uniformly random to someone who didn’t understand the secret, but someone who did know the key might later on sum g over all n-grams and see that it was anomalously big.”

Watermarking is a Privacy-first Option

I have actually seen conversations on social networks where some individuals recommended that OpenAI could keep a record of every output it generates and utilize that for detection.

Scott Aaronson confirms that OpenAI might do that however that doing so poses a privacy issue. The possible exception is for police scenario, which he didn’t elaborate on.

How to Spot ChatGPT or GPT Watermarking

Something intriguing that seems to not be popular yet is that Scott Aaronson kept in mind that there is a way to beat the watermarking.

He didn’t say it’s possible to beat the watermarking, he said that it can be beat.

“Now, this can all be beat with adequate effort.

For instance, if you used another AI to paraphrase GPT’s output– well okay, we’re not going to be able to discover that.”

It seems like the watermarking can be beat, at least in from November when the above statements were made.

There is no indicator that the watermarking is presently in usage. However when it does enter usage, it may be unidentified if this loophole was closed.


Read Scott Aaronson’s blog post here.

Included image by Best SMM Panel/RealPeopleStudio