Google: Disavowing Random Links Flagged By Tools Is A Waste Of Time

Posted by

Google’s John Mueller responded to a question about using the link disavow tool and offered a suggestion about the very best method to utilize it, particularly mentioning links flagged by tools.

Although this tool was introduced ten years ago there is still much confusion regarding the proper usage of it.

Link Disavow Tool

The link disavow tool was introduced by Google in October 2012.

The disavow tool followed in the wake of the Penguin Algorithm from May 2012, which introduced a duration of unprecedented turmoil in the search marketing neighborhood due to the fact that many individuals were buying and selling links.

This duration of openly buying and offering links pulled up on Might 2012 when the Penguin algorithm upgrade was launched and countless sites lost rankings.

Earning money links eliminated was a big discomfort for since they needed to demand elimination from every website, one by one.

There were numerous link elimination demands that some website owners began charging a charge to remove the links.

The SEO neighborhood begged Google for a much easier way to disavow links and in action to popular demand Google released the Link Disavow tool on October 2012 for the express purpose of disavowing spam links that a website owner was accountable for.

The concept of a link disavow tool was something that had been subjugating for many years, at least because 2007.

Google resisted launching that tool up until after the Penguin update.

Google’s official statement from October 2012 explained:

“If you’ve been alerted of a manual spam action based upon “abnormal links” pointing to your website, this tool can help you attend to the concern.

If you haven’t gotten this notice, this tool generally isn’t something you require to stress over.”

Google likewise provided information of what kinds of links might set off a manual action:

“We send you this message when we see evidence of paid links, link exchanges, or other link plans that break our quality standards.”

John Mueller Suggestions on Link Disavow Tool

Mueller addressed a question about disavowing links to a domain property and as a side note provided suggestions on the appropriate use of the tool.

The concern asked was:

“The disavow feature in Search Console is presently unavailable for domain homes. What are the alternatives then?”

John Mueller addressed:

“Well, if you have domain level verification in location, you can confirm the prefix level without needing any extra tokens.

Verify that host and do what you need to do.”

Then Mueller included an extra comment about the appropriate method to utilize the link disavow tool.

Mueller continued his answer:

“Also, remember that disavowing random links that look weird or that some tool has actually flagged, is not a good use of your time.

It alters nothing.

Utilize the disavow tool for situations where you really spent for links and can’t get them gotten rid of later on.”

Poisonous Link Tools and Random Hyperlinks

Lots of third party tools use exclusive algorithms to score backlinks according to how spammy or harmful the tool company feels they are.

Those toxicity ratings may accurately rank how bad particular links appear to be however they don’t always associate with how Google ranks and utilizes links.

Toxic link tool ratings are just viewpoints.

The tools are useful for producing an automated backlink review, particularly when they highlight unfavorable links that you believed were great.

Nevertheless, the only links one ought to be disavowing are the links one understands are paid for or belong of a link plan.

Should You Think Anecdotal Proof of Toxic Hyperlinks?

Many people experience ranking losses and when examining their backlinks are stunned to discover a large amount of extremely poor quality websites linking to their websites.

Naturally it’s assumed that this is the reason for the ranking drops and a never-ending cycle of link disavowing commences.

In those cases it might be useful to consider that there is some other factor for the change in rankings.

One case that sticks out is when someone came to me about an unfavorable SEO attack. I had a look at the links and they were actually bad, exactly as described.

There were numerous adult themed spam relate to exact match anchor text on unrelated adult subjects indicating his website.

Those backlinks fit the meaning of an unfavorable SEO attack.

I was curious so I privately got in touch with a Googler by email.They emailed me back the next day and confirmed that negative SEO was not the reason the website had actually lost rankings.

The real cause for the loss of rankings was that the site was impacted by the Panda algorithm.

What triggered the Panda algorithm was low quality content that the website owner had actually created.

I have seen this often times since then, where the real issue was that the site owner was unable to objectively examine their own content so they blamed links.

It’s valuable to keep in mind that what seems like the obvious factor for a loss in rankings is not always the actual factor, it’s just the simplest to blame due to the fact that it’s apparent.

However as John Mueller stated, disavowing links that a tool has actually flagged which aren’t paid links is not an excellent use of time.


Featured image by Best SMM Panel/Asier Romero

Listen to the Google SEO Office Hours video at the 1:10 minute mark